Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Tax; Notice

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 2, 2015//

Tax; Notice

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 2, 2015//

Listen to this article

U.S. Court of Appeals  For the Seventh Circuit

Civil

Tax; Notice

Where the taxpayer filed no tax returns for years, and the IRS mailed notice of tax deficiencies to the address of most recent tax return, he received proper notice.

“[E]ven assuming arguendo that the IRS had a duty to conduct further investigation for Gyorgy’s address, he does not identify what reasonable steps it could have taken to find him. There is no evidence that the IRS had record—let alone clear and concise notification—of an address where he could have been reached in 2006 and 2007. It had already tried, to no avail, to verify the Jean Street address on his 2003 W-2. It appears, in fact, that Gyorgy did not want to be found. From 2001 through 2008, he filed no tax returns, moved seven times, never remained in the same place for more than roughly eighteen months, and often moved on after only a few months. Yet he never notified the IRS of his new addresses. The IRS cannot be expected to keep track of an itinerant taxpayer in such circumstances. See Marks, 947 F.2d at 986 (‘[A] taxpayer’s effort “to obscure the change in his address so as to confound the IRS” is a factor relevant in assessing whether the Commissioner acted properly.’ (citation omitted)).”

Affirmed.

13-3363 Gyorgy v. CIR

Appeal from the United States Tax Court, Kanne, J.

Full Text

 

Polls

Should Wisconsin Supreme Court rules be amended so attorneys can't appeal license revocation after 5 years?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests