Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Case Digests / Professional Responsibility – No discipline

Professional Responsibility – No discipline

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Civil

Professional Responsibility – No discipline

Where attorney Michael M. Rajek’s violations of the rules of professional conduct were all minor, no discipline is ordered.

“Having considered the referee’s report and the parties’ briefs and oral argument on appeal, we conclude that Attorney Rajek committed the rule violations on five counts as found by the referee. The violations, however, involved relatively minor failures of communication, including failures in some instances to provide certain notices or pieces of information to clients under Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 20:1.15(b)(4m), which sets forth the alternative procedure for handling advanced fees. They did not involve the sufficiency or quality of the legal representation provided by Attorney Rajek to his clients. Given the particular facts of this case and the nature of the violations, we determine that it is not necessary to impose any discipline on Attorney Rajek and that there is no basis for a restitution award. We do require Attorney Rajek to pay costs, but we reduce the amount of costs he must pay to $8,500.”

2011AP387-D OLR v. Rajek

Per Curiam.

Full Text

 


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*