Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Insurance – UIM coverage – notice

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 13, 2015//

Insurance – UIM coverage – notice

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 13, 2015//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Insurance – UIM coverage – notice

APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Marathon County:  GREGORY E. GRAU, Judge.  Affirmed.

Ricky and Janet Raygo appeal a summary judgment dismissing their underinsured motorist (UIM) claim against their automobile insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.  The Raygos sought UIM coverage for injuries Ricky sustained in a February 27, 2012 accident.  The circuit court concluded the Raygos were not entitled to UIM coverage under three policies issued by State Farm, pursuant to altered policy terms that took effect shortly before the accident.  The Raygos argue the altered policy provisions never went into effect because State Farm failed to provide notice as required by the policies.  We reject the Raygos’ argument and affirm.

2014AP001547 Ricky W. Raygo v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company

DISTRICT III; Marathon County; GREGORY E. GRAU; Hoover, P.J., Stark, Hruz, JJ.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Tyndall, Susan R., Laughlin, Theresa B.,Tyndall, Susan R., Laughlin, Theresa B. For Defendant: Kramer, John A., Dolata, Timothy J. For Respondent: Hebl, Andrew Bryant, Gendreau, Chad R., Skiles, Randall M.

Full Text

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests