Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Sentencing – accurate information – restitution

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 23, 2014//

Sentencing – accurate information – restitution

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 23, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing – accurate information – restitution

APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: DAVID A. HANSHER, Judge. Affirmed.

Timothy D. Russell appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after he pled guilty to one count of theft, see Wis. Stat. § 943.20(1)(b) (2011-12),[1]
and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Russell argues that: he was deprived of due process when the circuit court allegedly
erroneously sentenced him for the crime of misconduct in public office; and the circuit court erred when it ordered Russell to pay restitution for a West
Milwaukee office space because he alleges that the State failed to demonstrate a causal nexus between the office space and his crimes. Because the record
belies Russell’s assertions in both instances, we affirm.

2014AP000451-CR State v. Timothy D. Russell

Attorneys: For Appellant: Cornwall, Andrea Taylor For Respondent: Balistreri, Thomas J., Loebel, Karen A.

DISTRICT I, Milwaukee County, DAVID A. HANSHER, BRENNAN, J.

Full Text

 

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests