Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Habeas Corpus — breach of plea agreement

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 21, 2014//

Habeas Corpus — breach of plea agreement

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 21, 2014//

Listen to this article

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit

Criminal

Habeas Corpus — breach of plea agreement

Where the state did not breach the plea agreement, defense counsel was not deficient for failing to object.

“Here, the prosecutor addressed the pertinent sentencing factors that the court had to consider, and recommended a sentence of twenty years. We agree with the state court and district court that the prosecutor’s remarks did not undermine the State’s sentence recommendation and ‘balance[d] [the state’s] duty to convey relevant information to the sentencing court against its duty to honor the plea agreement.’ Although the prosecutor’s arguments emphasized negative information, it seems that there wasn’t much positive to be said about Campbell or the offense. Further, the prosecutor’s arguments supported the position that a significant sentence was appropriate. A bifurcated sentence of twenty years is not an insignificant sentence, and five to seven years is not a short term of imprisonment. With one possible exception addressed below, we conclude that the state court reasonably determined that the prosecutor’s resentencing arguments did not materially and substantially breach the plea agreement.”

Affirmed.

13-3780 Campbell v. Smith

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, Reinhard, J., Tinder, J.

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests