Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — postconviction discovery — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 15, 2014//

Criminal Procedure — postconviction discovery — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 15, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — postconviction discovery — ineffective assistance

David Marshall, pro se, appeals an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief. Marshall argues the circuit court erred by denying: (1) his postconviction discovery request for access to an audio recording of the police interview of witness Matthew Krzoska; and (2) a presentence “motion to reverse judgment of guilty.” Marshall also claims he was denied the effective assistance of postconviction counsel and appears to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions. We reject these arguments and affirm the order. This opinion will not be published.

2013AP2386 State v. Marshall

Dist III, Outagamie County, Gage, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Marshall, David J., pro se; For Respondent: Balistreri, Thomas J., Madison; Schneider, Carrie A., Appleton

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests