Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Motor Vehicles – OWI — reasonable suspicion — implied consent

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 25, 2014//

Motor Vehicles – OWI — reasonable suspicion — implied consent

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 25, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Motor Vehicles – OWI — reasonable suspicion — implied consent

Steven Seward appeals the judgment finding him guilty of operating while intoxicated and operating with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC) in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) and 346.63(1)(b). Seward argues that the circuit court erred in: (1) finding that the officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop; and (2) finding that the officer complied with the implied consent law, and affording the City the evidentiary benefits of automatic admissibility and the statutory presumption of intoxication. I conclude that the circuit court did not err in finding that the officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop and in finding that the officer complied with the implied consent law. Accordingly, I affirm the judgment. This opinion will not be published.

2014AP735 City of Tomah v. Seward

Dist IV, Monroe County, Rice, J., Kloppenburg, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Holevoet, John, Madison; For Respondent: Precour-Berry, Penny Jean, Tomah

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests