Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 9, 2014//

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 9, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

Kevin Lee Banister, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief brought under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12). The circuit court determined that the motion was procedurally barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994), and State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, 281 Wis. 2d 157, 696 N.W.2d 574. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2014AP66 State v. Banister

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Grady, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Banister, Kevin Lee, pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Winter, Tiffany M., Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests