Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Consumer Protection — Wisconsin Consumer Act — unilateral changes

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 29, 2014//

Consumer Protection — Wisconsin Consumer Act — unilateral changes

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 29, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Consumer Protection — Wisconsin Consumer Act — unilateral changes

Joseph R. Cincotta appeals from a judgment dismissing his claims against BMO Harris Bank N.A. Cincotta argues that: (1) BMO violated the Wisconsin Consumer Act when it unilaterally changed the terms of his Reserve Loan Account and began imposing a $10 advance fee; and (2) the $10 advance fee is unconscionable. We disagree and affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2013AP2251 Cincotta v. BMO Harris Bank NA

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Carroll, J., Brennan, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Cincotta, Joseph, Milwaukee; For Respondent: Apfeld, Michael B., Milwaukee; Kreiter, Maria L., Milwaukee

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests