Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Professional Responsibility — public reprimand

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 24, 2014//

Professional Responsibility — public reprimand

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 24, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Civil

Professional Responsibility — public reprimand

Where attorney John M. Curtin was publicly reprimanded in Arizona, reciprocal discipline is appropriate.

“Based upon our independent review of the matter, we conclude that the SCR 22.12 stipulation should be accepted and that Attorney Curtin should be publicly reprimanded as discipline identical to that imposed by the Arizona Supreme Court. Since Attorney Curtin entered into a stipulation with the OLR and there was no need to appoint a referee, we conclude that no costs should be assessed.”

2013AP2705-D OLR v. Curtin

Per curiam.

Attorneys: For Complainant: Hendrix, Jonathan E., Madison; For Respondent: Curtin, John M., Phoenix, Ariz.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests