Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Evidence — other acts — sexual assault — expert testimony

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 10, 2014//

Evidence — other acts — sexual assault — expert testimony

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 10, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Evidence — other acts — sexual assault — expert testimony

Jose Reynosa appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree sexual assault of a child and child enticement. He also appeals an order denying postconviction relief. Reynosa contends that: (1) the circuit court erroneously admitted other acts evidence of uncharged sexual assaults by Reynosa against the same victim; and (2) Reynosa was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his counsel did not raise the proper objection to the State’s expert testimony and did not request a unanimity instruction. We reject these contentions. We affirm the judgment of conviction and order denying postconviction relief. This opinion will not be published.

2013AP1780-CR State v. Reynosa

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Dallet, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Jensen, Jeffrey W., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Moeller, Marguerite M., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests