Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Tax — discovery

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 19, 2014//

Tax — discovery

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 19, 2014//

Listen to this article

U.S. Supreme Court

Civil

Tax — discovery

A taxpayer has a right to conduct an examination of IRS officials regarding their reasons for issuing a summons when he points to specific facts or circumstances plausibly raising an inference of bad faith.

A person receiving a summons is entitled to contest it in an adversarial enforcement proceeding. Donaldson v. United States, 400 U. S. 517, 524. But these proceedings are “summary in nature,” United States v. Stuart, 489 U. S. 353, 369, and the only relevant question is whether the summons was issued in good faith, United States v. Powell, 379 U. S. 48, 56. The balance struck in this Court’s prior cases supports a requirement that a summons objector offer not just naked allegations, but some credible evidence to support his claim of improper motive. Circumstantial evidence can suffice to meet that burden, and a fleshed out case is not demanded: The taxpayer need only present a plausible basis for his charge.

517 Fed. Appx. 689, vacated and remanded.

13-301 U.S. v. Clarke

Kagan, J.

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests