Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Professional Responsibility — revocation

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 19, 2014//

Professional Responsibility — revocation

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 19, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Civil

Professional Responsibility — revocation

Where attorney William J. Grogan committed 33 acts of misconduct, revocation is appropriate.

“Based upon our review of the record, we approve and adopt the referee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. We determine that the seriousness of Attorney Grogan’s misconduct demonstrates that his law license must be revoked to protect the public, courts, and legal system from the repetition of the misconduct; to impress upon Attorney Grogan the seriousness of his misconduct; and to deter other attorneys from engaging in similar misconduct. We also agree with and adopt the referee’s recommendation that Attorney Grogan be ordered to pay restitution and costs as described above.”

2012AP2361-D OLR v. Grogan

 

Per Curiam.

Attorneys: For Appellant: St. Ores, Sheryl A., Madison; For Respondent: Grogan, William J., Appleton

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests