Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Professional Responsibility – suspension

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 6, 2014//

Professional Responsibility – suspension

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 6, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Civil

Professional Responsibility – suspension

Attorney was the subject of a separate disciplinary proceeding wherein he was suspended for 60 days. The court agrees with the referee that, since the misconduct here could have been included in the complaint in the previously filed disciplinary proceeding against Attorney Osicka, Case No. 2012AP60-D, the proper level of discipline to be imposed is a 60-day suspension that is concurrent with the suspension imposed in that case. The instant case alleges Osicka practiced law when his license previously was suspended, failed to notify clients that he was suspended, and failed to cooperate with the OLR. Since Attorney Osicka initially disputed some portions of the OLR’s complaint and the stipulation he entered was only partial in nature, we require Attorney Osicka to pay the full costs of this proceeding.

2013AP434-D OLR v. Osicka

Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Complainant: Spoke, Julie Marie, Madison; For Respondent: Osicka, Timothy, Schofield

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests