Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Professional Responsibility – dismissed

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 6, 2014//

Professional Responsibility – dismissed

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 6, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Civil

Professional Responsibility – dismissed

The court agreed with the referee’s conclusion that Attorney Johns’ conduct resulting in a 2004 felony conviction did not reflect adversely on his honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects so as to violate SCR 20:8.4(b). It disagreed with the referee’s conclusion that Attorney Johns violated SCR 21.15(5),] as enforced via SCR 20:8.4(f), by failing to notify the clerk of the supreme court and the OLR, in writing, of his conviction. We conclude that Attorney Johns’ violation of SCR 21.15(5) was too technical to justify the imposition of legal consequences. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed.

2011AP2760-D OLR v. Johns

Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Basting, Thomas J., Tucson, AZ; Weigel, William J., Madison; For Respondent: Dietrich, Dean R., Wausau; Johns, Dan Jr., Manitowish Waters

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests