Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Sentencing — restitution

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 4, 2014//

Sentencing — restitution

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 4, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — restitution

Patrick L. Hibl appeals from a judgment of conviction for negligent handling of burning material, party to a crime, including a condition to pay $24,220 in restitution to William Eubanks for fire damage to Eubanks’s house. Hibl argues that there was no nexus established between the crime and the damage to the house. Additionally, Hibl argues that the trial court failed to consider Hibl’s ability to pay the restitution. We reject Hibl’s arguments and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2013AP2723-CR State v. Hibl

Dist II, Walworth County, Race, J., Neubauer, P.J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Giesen, Charles W., Madison; For Respondent: Weber, Gregory M., Madison; Rea, Haley, Elkhorn

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests