Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Professional Responsibility — reinstatement

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 23, 2014//

Professional Responsibility — reinstatement

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 23, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Civil

Professional Responsibility — reinstatement

Where the conduct of attorney Tracy R. Eichhorn-Hicks has been beyond reproach since his suspension, reinstatement is appropriate.

“The referee found that Attorney Eichhorn-Hicks complied with the terms of the order of his suspension. While the referee noted that Attorney Eichhorn-Hicks did not timely file the affidavit required by SCR 22.26(1)(e), the referee found this to be a technical violation and an insignificant factor in assessing the request for reinstatement. The referee found that Attorney Eichhorn-Hicks has maintained competence in learning in the law by attending various educational activities, and the referee found that Attorney Eichhorn-Hicks’ conduct since the suspension has been exemplary and above reproach.”

2011AP2326-D OLR v. Eichhorn-Hicks

Per Curiam.

Attorneys: For Complainant: Arnold, Wayne A., Rice Lake; Weigel, William J., Madison; For Respondent: Eichhorn Hicks, Tracy R., Minneapolis

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests