By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 23, 2014//
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Civil
Professional Responsibility — reinstatement
Where the conduct of attorney Tracy R. Eichhorn-Hicks has been beyond reproach since his suspension, reinstatement is appropriate.
“The referee found that Attorney Eichhorn-Hicks complied with the terms of the order of his suspension. While the referee noted that Attorney Eichhorn-Hicks did not timely file the affidavit required by SCR 22.26(1)(e), the referee found this to be a technical violation and an insignificant factor in assessing the request for reinstatement. The referee found that Attorney Eichhorn-Hicks has maintained competence in learning in the law by attending various educational activities, and the referee found that Attorney Eichhorn-Hicks’ conduct since the suspension has been exemplary and above reproach.”
2011AP2326-D OLR v. Eichhorn-Hicks
Per Curiam.
Attorneys: For Complainant: Arnold, Wayne A., Rice Lake; Weigel, William J., Madison; For Respondent: Eichhorn Hicks, Tracy R., Minneapolis