Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 13, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

Lashawn E. Gates appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered on his guilty plea, for one count of soliciting a child for prostitution, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.08 (2011–12).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his motion for resentencing. He argues that he is entitled to resentencing because: (1) the trial court relied on inaccurate information at sentencing; and (2) his trial lawyer provided constitutionally deficient representation at sentencing. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2013AP1054-CR State v. Gates

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Dallet, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Paulson, Randall E., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Wittwer, Jacob J., Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event