Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Professional Responsibility — conditional admission

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 9, 2014//

Professional Responsibility — conditional admission

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 9, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Civil

Professional Responsibility — conditional admission

Where B.R.C. has fulfilled the character requirements, his license to practice law is reinstated, subject to continued monitoring.

“We agree that B.R.C. must complete the full two years of monitoring as his conditional admission originally required, with a monitor located in the Milwaukee area, if possible. At this time, there is insufficient cause to warrant extending the conditions imposed on B.R.C. past July 2, 2014. See SCR40.075(6). If B.R.C. fails to comply with the terms of his monitoring contract before it terminates, the parties shall immediately advise the court and we reserve the right to reconsider this decision. However, we accept the referee’s conclusion that B.R.C. has demonstrated character and fitness sufficient to warrant his admission to the bar subject to successful completion of the monitoring contract. Upon completion of the monitoring contract he will be deemed admitted, without conditions.”

2012XX605-BA BBE v. BRC

Per Curiam.

Attorneys: For Complainant: Rothstein, Jacquelynn, Madison; For Respondent: Scherr, Werner Erich, Milwaukee

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests