Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Reckless injury — sufficiency of the evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 27, 2014//

Reckless injury — sufficiency of the evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 27, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Reckless injury — sufficiency of the evidence

This case arises from a drug deal gone bad. The defendant, Jimmy Powell, met up with one of his customers to sell him some cocaine. The customer ended up with life-threatening injuries. The case went to trial with Powell facing three charges. Powell was acquitted of two charges and convicted of the third. Powell challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and alleges several instances of circuit court error and ineffective assistance of counsel relating to the trial. He also argues that the circuit court improperly applied $20,000 of bond money posted on his behalf to restitution even though that $20,000 specifically related to the two charges on which he was acquitted. We reject all of Powell’s arguments, and affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2013AP1111-CR State v. Powell

Dist IV, Dane County, Ehlke, J., Lundsten, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Edwards, Suzanne, Dodgeville; For Respondent: Wellman, Sally L., Madison; Rusch, Shelly J., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests