Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Insurance — UIM coverage – stacking — drive-other-car exclusions

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 18, 2014//

Insurance — UIM coverage – stacking — drive-other-car exclusions

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 18, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Insurance — UIM coverage – stacking — drive-other-car exclusions

Thomas Whalen, Holly Whalen, Jacob Whalen, and Keaton Whalen (collectively “Whalen”) appeal a partial summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The circuit court held that Wis. Stat. § 632.32(6)(d) did not prohibit antistacking provisions in insurance policies. We conclude this case is controlled by our supreme court’s recent decision in Belding v. Demoulin, 2014 WI 8, ___ Wis. 2d ___, ___ N.W.2d ___. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. This opinion will not be published.

2013AP24 Whalen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., et al.

Dist III, Lincoln County, Yackel, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Allen, Shannon A., Milwaukee; Tlusty, Jessica J., Schofield; Meuler, Christopher M., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Covelli, Claude J., Madison; Dolata, Timothy J., Green Bay

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests