Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Evidence — prior consistent statements

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 25, 2014//

Evidence — prior consistent statements

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 25, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Evidence — prior consistent statements

Darren L. Wines appeals a judgment convicting him of one count of second-degree sexual assault with use of force and one count of battery. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Wines argues: (1) that Police Officer Isabel Monreal should not have been allowed to testify about prior consistent statements made by child witness D.W.; and (2) that the circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion because it incorrectly inferred from the record that he exercised control over the actions of the victim, S.W., his wife. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2013AP352-CR State v. Wines

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Dallet, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Schoenfeldt, Mark A., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Lloyd, Katherine Desmond, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests