Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 25, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

Lloyd T. Schuenke, pro se, appeals from an order denying his postconviction motions for relief in cases from 1991, 2007, and 2008. The circuit court explained that, with respect to the 1991 case, the motion was barred both because of State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994), and because Schuenke’s 1991 sentence had expired. The motions in the 2007 and 2008 cases were denied because they were predicated on invalidation of the 1991 conviction. We affirm. This opinion shall not be published.

2013AP469, 2013AP470, 2013AP471 State v. Schuenke

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Wagner, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Schuenke, Lloyd T., pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Remington, Christine A., Milwaukee

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event