Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Insurance — sexual molestation exclusions

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 28, 2014//

Insurance — sexual molestation exclusions

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 28, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Insurance — sexual molestation exclusions

Grant R. appeals a judgment that dismissed his claims against Farmers Automobile Insurance Association and Pekin Insurance Company. The circuit court concluded Farmers and Pekin had no duty to defend or indemnify their insured, Mary Heisz, because the sexual molestation exclusions in their policies precluded coverage for Grant R.’s claims. We agree and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2013AP1623 Heisz, et al. v. Heisz, et al.

Dist IV, La Crosse County, Levine, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Ablan, Michael C., La Crosse; Tess-Mattner, Kent A., Brookfield; For Respondent: Grady, Lance S., Waukesha; Miller, Daniel K., Waukesha

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests