Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Sentencing — modification

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 7, 2014//

Sentencing — modification

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 7, 2014//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — modification

Doniver Antonio Johnson appeals from a judgment of conviction for one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm as a repeater, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 941.29(2) and 939.62(1)(b) (2009-10). He also appeals from an order that denied his motion for sentence modification or resentencing. Johnson argues that he is entitled to “a new sentencing hearing because key information was not provided at the hearing that would have [a]ffected the outcome” and because the trial court “did not note on the record [its] reasoning” for ordering that Johnson’s sentence be served consecutive to his sentence in another case. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP2327-CR State v. Johnson

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Dallet, Watts, JJ., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Bailey, Chris M., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Pray, Eileen W., Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests