Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Bankruptcy – nondischargeability — issue preclusion

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 23, 2013//

Bankruptcy – nondischargeability — issue preclusion

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 23, 2013//

Listen to this article

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Civil

Bankruptcy – nondischargeability — issue preclusion

State court judgments for conversion and tortious interference are insufficient to support an exception from discharge as a debt arising from a “willful and malicious injury.”

“If accepted, First Weber’s position would risk transforming every state-law intentional tort into a non-dischargeable debt, contrary to the Supreme Court’s opinion in Geiger. That problem, added to ‘the strong policy of the Bankruptcy Code of providing a debtor with a “fresh start,”’ see Meyer v. Rigdon, 36 F.3d 1375, 1385 (7th Cir. 1994), leads us to conclude that the state court’s decision did not preclude Horsfall from litigating the issue of willfulness in the bankruptcy case.”

Affirmed.

13-1026 First Weber Group, Inc., v. Horsfall

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, Conley, J., Wood, J.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests