Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Evidence – relevance — undue prejudice — harmless error

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 18, 2013//

Evidence – relevance — undue prejudice — harmless error

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 18, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Evidence – relevance — undue prejudice — harmless error

George A. Trinka appeals from a judgment convicting him of first-degree reckless homicide and first-degree recklessly endangering safety, both with the use of a dangerous weapon, following a jury trial. Trinka argues that the trial court erred when it allowed the State to introduce into evidence a family photograph depicting the victim, his wife, and his children. We affirm because we conclude that, even if the court did err, the error was harmless. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2013AP539-CR State v. Trinka

Dist II, Washington County, Muehlbauer, J., Gundrum, J.

Attorneys: For Appellants: Erickson, Dianne M., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Bensen, Mark, West Bend; Winter, Tiffany M., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests