Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Evidence — expert testimony

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 13, 2013//

Evidence — expert testimony

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 13, 2013//

Listen to this article

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Criminal

Evidence — expert testimony

It was not err to permit a police officer to testify as an expert about the meaning of drug trafficking code words.

“This is not a case where Johnson was testifying both as an expert and as a lay witness, where the risk of unfair prejudice is more troublesome. See, e.g., Lipscomb, 14 F.3d at 1242 (‘Testimony is understood to carry dangers of its own, particularly when the expert is also one of the officers involved in the arrest.’). Here, Johnson testified only as an expert witness; he had no prior links to Garcia, nor had he participated in investigating the case.”

Affirmed.

13-1313 U.S. v. Garcia-Avila

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Lefkow, J., Bauer, J.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests