Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Case Digests / Professional Responsibility — suspension

Professional Responsibility — suspension

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Civil

Professional Responsibility — suspension

Where attorney Suzanne M. Smith committed 20 acts of misconduct, a six-month suspension is appropriate.

“Although there are both mitigating and aggravating factors to consider in weighing the seriousness of Attorney Smith’s misconduct, the balance does not tip in Attorney Smith’s favor.  Weighing in Attorney Smith’s favor are the facts that she did not operate with a malicious intent, she did not benefit personally from her misconduct, and, according to the referee, she experienced medical problems during the period in question that can explain some portion of her misconduct.  Also weighing in Attorney Smith’s favor is the fact that she has expressed remorse for her behavior.  Weighing more heavily against Attorney Smith are the facts that both this case and her previous disciplinary case show a troubling pattern of poor bookkeeping, office mismanagement, inadequate communication with clients, and insufficient concern for her clients’ reasonable needs.  Attorney Smith also has displayed a pattern of excuse-making, blame-shifting, and obfuscation which suggests that these types of transgressions could happen again.”

2011AP2946-D OLR v. Smith

 

Per Curiam.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Smith, Suzanne M., Burlington; For Respondent: Spoke, Julie Marie, Madison


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*