Possession of Child Pornography — sufficiency of the evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 6, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Possession of Child Pornography — sufficiency of the evidence

Neil R. Klett appeals an order of commitment after a two-part jury trial where, in phase one, a jury found him guilty of seven counts of possession of child pornography, but, during phase two, found him not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect. Klett contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdicts in phase one. We disagree and affirm the order. This opinion will not be published.

2013AP68-CR State v. Klett

Dist II, Washington County, Pouros, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Henak, Robert R., Milwaukee; Henak, Ellen, Milwaukee; For Respondent: Balistreri, Thomas J., Madison; Bensen, Mark, West Bend

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event