Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — plea withdrawal

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 22, 2013//

Criminal Procedure — plea withdrawal

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 22, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — plea withdrawal

Nickolas James Laumann appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his plea because: (1) the elements of the offenses were not fully explained to him at the plea hearing; (2) he did not know the “degree” of sexual assault to which he was pleading guilty; (3) the circuit court did not advise him of his privilege against self-incrimination before asking him if it could use the complaint as a factual basis for the plea; and (4) there is newly discovered evidence that the victim recanted. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP927, 2012AP981 State v. Laumann

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Hansher, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Laumann, Nickolas James, pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; O’Neil, Aaron R., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests