Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Contracts – consequential damages

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 22, 2013//

Contracts – consequential damages

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 22, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Contracts – consequential damages — attorney fees

Carl Rucker, pro se, appeals from a judgment of the trial court, entered on motions after verdict. Rucker believes the trial court erred when it reduced the jury’s damage award by almost half, disallowed consequential damages including attorney fees, disallowed pre-judgment interest, and specified the post-judgment interest rate would be 4 percent rather than 12 percent. We discern no error, so we affirm the judgment. This opinion shall not be published.

2012AP1049 Rucker v. E.R. Wagner Manufacturing Co.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Witkowiak, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Rucker, Carl, pro se; For Respondent: Zbaracki, Andrew J., Milwaukee; Fischer, William E., Milwaukee; Demo, Michael C., Brookfield; Smiricky, Stacey, Chicago; Taylor, Trina K., Chicago

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests