Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Civil Procedure — issue preclusion

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 15, 2013//

Civil Procedure — issue preclusion

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 15, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Civil Procedure — issue preclusion — claim preclusion — election of remedies

Goldridge Group, LLP (Group) appeals a money judgment in favor of RTS Roofing, Inc., arguing the circuit court erroneously determined RTS’s claims were not barred by issue preclusion, claim preclusion, or the election of remedies doctrine. We reject Group’s arguments, and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2013AP804-FT RTS Roofing Inc. v. Goldridge Group LLP

Dist III. Eau Claire County, Lenz, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Solochek, Albert, Milwaukee; Pilmaier, Jason R., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Freund, Daniel R., Eau Claire

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests