Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 1, 2013//

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 1, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

William Starck appeals judgments convicting him of three counts of third-degree sexual assault. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his no contest pleas in which he alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. He contends his attorney failed to adequately review the evidence against him before advising him to enter no contest pleas, leaving Starck unaware of weaknesses in the State’s case. We affirm the judgments and order. This opinion will not be published.

2013AP330-CR, 2013AP331-CR State v. Starck

Dist III, Chippewa County, Cray, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Chapman, Dan, Hudson; For Respondent: Kassel, Jeffrey J., Madison; Gibbs, Steven H., Chippewa Falls

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests