Sentencing — repeater enhancements

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 4, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — repeater enhancements

Emmit L. Groce, Jr., pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to correct his sentence. Groce—who was convicted in 2011 of criminal damage to property as a repeater—filed a motion to correct his sentence in 2013, arguing that two unpublished cases, State v. Gerondale, 2010 WI App 1, 322 Wis. 2d 737, 778 N.W.2d 172 (unpublished), and State v. Ash, 2012 WI App 106, 344 Wis. 2d 299, 821 N.W.2d 413 (unpublished), required the trial court to modify his sentence. The trial court denied his motion. On appeal, Groce renews the arguments rejected by the trial court. This court affirms. This opinion will not be published.

2013AP844-CR State v. Groce

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Gordon, J., Curley, P.J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Groce, Emmit L., Jr., pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Weber, Gregory M., Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event