Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Evidence — other acts

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 4, 2013//

Evidence — other acts

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 4, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Evidence — other acts

Antonio Luckett appeals from a judgment convicting him of a total of eleven counts of battery, possession of THC and cocaine, threats to injure, possession of a firearm by a felon, and bail jumping and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, Luckett argues that the trial court erred in admitting six-year-old other-acts evidence or, alternatively, that defense counsel ineffectively failed to adequately object to its admission. Luckett also asserts that the prosecutor’s opening-statement, closing-argument, and rebuttal comments urged the jury to view the other-acts evidence as propensity evidence, and that defense counsel failed to object to it and request a curative instruction. We reject his contentions and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP1460-CR State v. Luckett

Dist II, Racine County, Gasiorkiewicz, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Lichstein, Byron C., Madison; For Respondent: Kassel, Jeffrey J., Madison; Chiapete, W. Richard, Racine

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests