By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 4, 2013//
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Civil
Contracts — parol evidence rule
James and Dale Roberts appeal a summary judgment dismissing their defenses and counterclaims to Bank of Kaukauna’s action to enforce personal guaranties. The Robertses argue the circuit court erroneously determined the parol evidence rule defeated their arguments. We agree with the circuit court’s alternative rationale—which the Robertses fail to refute—that any reliance on the Bank’s representations was unreasonable as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm. This opinion will not be published.
2013AP435 Bank of Kaukauna v. Roberts
Dist III, Outagamie County, Dyer, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Woodward, William S., Green Bay; Kowalkowski, Frank, Green Bay; For Respondent: Munroe, Philip A., Appleton