Motor Vehicles — implied consent

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 25, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Motor Vehicles — implied consent

Randel Clark appeals an order of the circuit court concluding that Clark’s refusal to submit to a chemical test, requested by a sheriff’s deputy pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 343.305, was unreasonable. The court revoked Clark’s operating privilege for one year. Clark’s sole argument on appeal is that the circuit court erroneously concluded that the State met its burden of showing that the arresting deputy conveyed the implied consent warnings in reading the Informing the Accused form to Clark “using those methods which reasonably assure access to those warnings.” This opinion will not be published.

2012AP2661 In the matter of the refusal of Randel R. Clark

Dist IV, Dodge County, Bauer, J., Blanchard, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Piel, Walter Arthur, Jr., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Sempf, James T., Juneau

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event