Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Prisons — administrative remedies

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 23, 2013//

Prisons — administrative remedies

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 23, 2013//

Listen to this article

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Civil

Prisons — administrative remedies

Where a prisoner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing a civil rights suit, judgment was properly entered in favor of the defendants.

“What the cases have not considered, however, is a situation in which prison personnel, sensing atypical cognitive or psychological infirmities of the prisoner plaintiff, deliberately exploit these infirmities to deter him from filing a grievance. That would be the kind of misconduct that the doctrine of equitable estoppel makes a defense to a variety of claims and defenses, most commonly a statute of limitations defense. See, e.g., Arteaga v. United States, 711 F.3d 828, 833 (7th Cir. 2013). In Kaba v. Stepp, supra, 458 F.3d at 686-87, we left open the possibility that equitable estoppel might be a defense to failure to exhaust prison remedies. We need not decide; the present case is remote from that hypothetical situation.”

Affirmed.

12-2568 Schultz v. Pugh

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, Crabb, J., Posner, J.

Polls

Should Hollywood and Nashville stay out of politics?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests