Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Immigration — adjustment of status

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 9, 2013//

Immigration — adjustment of status

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 9, 2013//

Listen to this article

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Civil

Immigration — adjustment of status

8 C.F.R. 245.1(i) is an unlawful regulation.

“The executive branch cannot decide, by rule or by decision, to abandon a duty that Congress has delegated to it. See INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 444-45, 449- 50 (1987) (holding invalid, under prong one of Chevron, a BIA interpretation that limited the Attorney General’s discretion in ways contrary to the will of Congress); see also Chevron, 467 U.S. at 843 n.9. Here, traditional tools of statutory construction indicate that Congress intended to give K-4s like Akram the opportunity to adjust status and join their parents in the United States. The regulation codified at 8 C.F.R. § 245.1(i), and the BIA decision applying it, both deny Akram that opportunity.”

Petition Granted.

12-3008 Akram v. Holder

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Kanne, J.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests