By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 11, 2013//
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Civil
Property – mortgages — good faith
Scott P. and Shelley Mattfeld appeal from a judgment and order denying their motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment to PHH Mortgage Company (PHH), thereby dismissing the Mattfelds’ claims. The Mattfelds contend that PHH violated its statutory obligation under Wis. Stat. § 138.052(7s)(a) (2011-12)[3] to timely supply them with the payoff amount for their mortgage. The Mattfelds also believe that PHH violated an implied contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing. We conclude that § 138.052(7s)(a) is unambiguous and does not require what the Mattfelds claim and, further, there was no contractual obligation that PHH breached. The circuit court’s grant of summary judgment to PHH was therefore appropriate, so we affirm. This opinion shall not be published.
2012AP1482 Mattfeld v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
Dist II, Waukesha County, Mac Davis, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Thompson, Gary W., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Nistler, Brent D., Brookfield; Tuchalski, Michael Frank, Jr., Brookfield