Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Forfeiture — stay

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 11, 2013//

Forfeiture — stay

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 11, 2013//

Listen to this article

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Criminal

Forfeiture — stay

Where state court criminal charges were pending, the district court should have stayed the forfeiture proceedings.

“The judge should have issued the stay pending the outcome of the state criminal proceeding (and maybe beyond, if the federal government is also contemplating prosecuting the claimants). The statute directed him to grant a stay if all three conditions were satisfied. And they were—he was mistaken, as we’ll see, in believing that condition (B), relating to standing, had not been satisfied. Had he granted the stay, no special interrogatories would have been issued until it expired and so no issue regarding the claimants’ refusal to answer some of the interrogatories would yet have arisen.”

Reversed and Remanded.

12-3568 U.S. v. $574,840

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Shadur, J., Posner, J.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests