Motor Vehicles — reckless driving — sufficiency of the evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 29, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Motor Vehicles — reckless driving — sufficiency of the evidence

Rahb J. Kettleson appeals pro se from a judgment of the trial court finding him guilty of reckless driving, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 346.62(2). In his brief-in-chief, Kettleson contends that “the state didn’t meet [its] burden of proof,” the court accepted “impossible testimony as convincing evidence,” and “the [County’s] witness … lied numerous times under oath.” We ultimately interpret Kettleson’s appeal as the County does, as a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP2230 County of Winnebago v. Kettleson

Dist II, Winnebago County, Jorgensen, J., Gundrum, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Kettleson, Rahb J., pro se; For Respondent: Levin, Adam Joseph, Oshkosh

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event