Criminal Procedure — new trials — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 14, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — new trials — ineffective assistance

Ronell Howlett appeals the judgment convicting him of three counts of first-degree sexual assault of a child under the age of thirteen, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1)(e) (2009-10).[2] He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. Howlett argues that he is entitled to a new trial because trial counsel was ineffective and because the real controversy was not fully tried. We reject Howlett’s arguments and affirm the conviction and order. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2012AP1672-CR State v. Howlett

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Martens, Sankovitz, JJ., Curley, P.J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Pray, John A., Madison; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Sanders, Michael C., Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event