Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 23, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

Danny F. Anton appeals from a judgment entered following a jury’s verdicts, convicting him of one count of first-degree sexual assault of a child and three counts of second-degree sexual assault of a child, and from an order denying his postconviction motion. On appeal, Anton argues that: (1) his right to the effective assistance of counsel was violated; and (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. For the reasons which follow, we affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2012AP1165-CR State v. Anton

Dist II, Waukesha County, Gundrum, Foster, JJ., Brennan, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Boyle, Gerald P., Milwaukee; Boyle, Bridget E., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Balistreri, Thomas J., Madison; Schimel, Brad, Waukesha

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event