Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 12, 2013//

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 12, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

Shane Gressel, pro se, appeals an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12) motion for postconviction relief. Gressel argues he is entitled to plea withdrawal because the colloquy was deficient, he was “medicated” at the plea hearing, and his trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude Gressel’s arguments have either already been litigated or are procedurally barred. The order is therefore affirmed. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP559 State v. Gressel

Dist III, Brown County, Atkinson, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Gressel, Shane M., pro se; For Respondent: Lasee, David L., Green Bay; Wittwer, Jacob J., Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests