Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Torts – defamation – privilege — damages

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 5, 2013//

Torts – defamation – privilege — damages

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 5, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Torts – defamation – privilege — damages

A county administrator is not entitled to immunity from a defamation suit, but damages are limited to $50,000.

“While a county board may act in a legislative capacity, it may also act in a supervisory or administrative capacity, such as by receiving reports during a meeting. See, e.g., Isle of Wight County v. Nogiec, 704 S.E.2d 83 (Va. 2011) (county board not acting in a legislative capacity when receiving a report from an assistant county administrator). Here, the board was conducting a regular meeting and not considering any existing or potential legislation. Hebert cannot claim a legislative privilege before a body that is not legislating.”

“Here, Anderson alleged Hebert made various defamatory statements on three separate occasions. Nonetheless, Anderson brought his claims in a single action. Because WIS. STAT. § 893.80(3) provides for one damages cap, per person, per action, the judgment must be reduced accordingly. We therefore direct the circuit court to reduce the judgment to $50,000.”

Affirmed in part, and Reversed in part.

Recommended for publication in the official reports.

2012AP1313 Anderson v. Hebert

Dist. III, Barron County, Harrington, J., Hoover, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Wistrom, Oyvind, Milwaukee; For Respondent:

Reinhardt, Peter M., Menomonie

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests