Sentencing — inaccurate information

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 26, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — inaccurate information

Samuel Joshua Schlemm appeals from a judgment of conviction for two counts of first-degree recklessly endangering safety by use of a dangerous weapon, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 941.30(1) and 939.63(1)(b) (2009-10). He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Schlemm seeks resentencing on grounds that the trial court relied on inaccurate information concerning the crimes and misinterpreted the statute related to risk reduction sentences. We conclude that Schlemm is not entitled to resentencing. Therefore, we affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP785-CR State v. Schlemm

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Hansher, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Schoenfeldt, Mark A., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Balistreri, Thomas J., Madison; Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event