Property — foreclosure

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Property — foreclosure

Michael W. Hobach appeals from a judgment of foreclosure in favor of CitiMortgage, Inc. Hobach argues that summary judgment was improper because CitiMortgage failed to establish that it held and was entitled to enforce the note and because there was no proof of service of the amended foreclosure complaint on Hobach. Hobach additionally contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to amend the pleadings. Pursuant to a presubmission conference and this court’s order of July 25, 2012, the parties submitted memorandum briefs. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.17(1) (2011-12). After briefing, CitiMortgage submitted a letter of supplemental authority, to which Hobach filed a response. Upon review of the memoranda, supplemental letters, and the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP1462-FT CitiMortgage Inc. v. Hobach et al.

Dist II, Racine County, Nieskes, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Zales, Nicholas C., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Lawless, Lisa M., Milwaukee; Zablocki, Steven, New Berlin