Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 12, 2013//

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 12, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

Anthony Terrill Kimber, pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Kimber’s motion was based on the alleged ineffectiveness of his postconviction counsel for not pursuing a claim of trial counsel ineffectiveness. Kimber claims his trial counsel performed ineffectively by not pursuing a motion to dismiss based upon the lack of subject matter and personal jurisdiction. The postconviction court concluded that Kimber’s jurisdictional arguments were without merit. As such, it held that neither trial counsel nor postconviction counsel provided ineffective assistance. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP878 State v. Kimber

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Wagner, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Kimber, Anthony Terrill, pro se; For Respondent: Kassel, Jeffrey J., Madison; Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests