By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 12, 2013//
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Criminal
Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance
Anthony Terrill Kimber, pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Kimber’s motion was based on the alleged ineffectiveness of his postconviction counsel for not pursuing a claim of trial counsel ineffectiveness. Kimber claims his trial counsel performed ineffectively by not pursuing a motion to dismiss based upon the lack of subject matter and personal jurisdiction. The postconviction court concluded that Kimber’s jurisdictional arguments were without merit. As such, it held that neither trial counsel nor postconviction counsel provided ineffective assistance. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Wagner, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Kimber, Anthony Terrill, pro se; For Respondent: Kassel, Jeffrey J., Madison; Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee